San Francisco Landlord-Tenant and Real Estate Attorneys
Call Us Today!
(415) 991-6078
Call Us Today!
(415) 991-6078

Case Studies

How Strategic Legal Action Helped Sellers Resolve a Disputed $42,000 Purchase Deposit

Sellers often find themselves in difficult positions when a buyer backs out of a real estate transaction. In this case, the sellers hired our firm and worked directly with attorney Jethro S. Busch, whose practice focuses on real property disputes and early-stage conflict resolution. The sellers needed to know whether they were entitled to retain a $42,000 purchase deposit after the buyer defaulted and refused to release the funds.

Their goal was simple: reach a lawful, efficient resolution without getting pulled into costly mediation, arbitration, or extended litigation.

The Problem: A Defaulted Buyer and a Disputed $42,000 Purchase Deposit

The sellers contacted us after the buyer failed to complete the purchase of their property. Despite clear contractual obligations, the buyer declined to authorize the release of the deposit.

The sellers needed clarity on their legal rights and guidance on how to proceed in a way that protected their financial interests without escalating the conflict. Attorney Jethro S. Busch evaluated the matter and identified a contract-based strategy supported by California law.

Why the Sellers Turned to Our Firm

The matter required an attorney familiar with California real property law, contract enforcement, and the liquidated damages provisions in standard purchase agreements. Jethro’s experience handling real estate contract disputes and purchase-deposit conflicts made him the appropriate attorney to lead the matter.

The sellers wanted a legal strategy rooted in the facts and the law, not unnecessary confrontation, and sought a firm capable of resolving the dispute promptly and professionally.

Our Approach: Legal Analysis Supported by a Persuasive Demand Letter

We reviewed the purchase agreement, the buyer’s conduct, and the sellers’ timely attempts to resell the property. Based on the terms of the agreement and California Civil Code §1675, we determined the sellers had a strong basis to pursue the full $42,000 purchase deposit as liquidated damages.

At the sellers’ direction, Jethro prepared a detailed demand letter that both explained the legal basis for recovery and proposed a strategic compromise: allowing the buyer to retain $10,000 of the deposit in exchange for releasing the remaining $32,000. The letter set out:

  • The buyer’s contractual default
    • The sellers’ good-faith efforts to resell the property
    • The price reduction necessary to complete the resale
    • The legal basis supporting retention of the liquidated damages
    • The anticipated costs of mediation, arbitration, and attorney involvement if the dispute continued
    • The proposed compromise designed to resolve the matter efficiently while still protecting the sellers’ interests

This approach gave opposing counsel a clear, reasonable path to an efficient resolution without forcing the parties into a prolonged dispute.

The Outcome: A Prompt Agreement and a $32,000 Recovery Without Litigation

Opposing counsel accepted the compromise. The parties signed escrow cancellation instructions, and the funds were distributed as agreed: $32,000 to the sellers and $10,000 to the buyer.

The matter resolved quickly and privately. The sellers did not need to file a claim, enter mediation, or pursue arbitration. This efficient outcome was the result of Jethro’s focused pre-litigation strategy and clear presentation of the statutory and contractual framework.

How This Result Improved the Client’s Situation

This outcome provided the sellers with:

  • A prompt recovery of $32,000 without the risk or expense of extended dispute resolution
    • Avoidance of substantial mediation or arbitration fees
    • A total legal spend of less than $2,000 to resolve the matter
    • Immediate closure after the buyer’s unexpected default
    • The ability to move forward with certainty and minimal disruption

For the sellers, the resolution balanced fairness, cost-efficiency, and legal strength, achieving their goals without unnecessary escalation.

If You’re Facing a Purchase Dispute, We’re Ready to Help

When a real estate buyer backs out, sellers are often left unsure of their options and worried about financial loss. Our firm helps property owners understand their rights, evaluate the strength of their position, and take decisive action grounded in California law.

Attorney Jethro S. Busch regularly assists clients with real property disputes, demand-letter negotiations, and pre-litigation strategies designed to resolve conflicts efficiently and effectively.

If you are dealing with a disputed deposit, contract default, or stalled transaction, our attorneys can guide you through your options and work toward a resolution that protects your time, your resources, and your peace of mind. Contact us to discuss your situation and learn how we may be able to assist.

Real-Estate-Attorneys-San-Francisco-CA

Ask A Real Estate Lawyer

Sidebar Form

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
I need help with:*

Real Solutions for Real Estate Problems

“The truth is, 99 percent of cases do not go to trial. The two sides eventually come to an agreement and settle. We know this from the thousands of cases we have handled. Therefore, we critically analyze our client’s situation to see if we can help them find an agreement earlier rather than later. The difference will mean enormous savings in time and legal fees.

We will do everything in our power to successfully resolve your landlord-tenant case or real estate dispute in as little time as possible. We have the resources to take on complex real estate cases and the size to keep you from becoming more than just a case file.”

sam law group

Steven Adair MacDonald & Partners, P.C.